Project part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund)

The Interreg IVB North Sea Region Programme


Disclaimer:
The authors are solely responsible for the content of this report. Material included herein does not represent the opinion of the European Community, and the European Community is not responsible for any use that might be made of it.
Back to overview measures



Walsoorden pilot part B (2006): relocation of dredged sediment to a shallow water area at the edge of the Walsoorden sandbar

Crux of the matter

This second relocation test also proved that the new relocation strategy is feasible. When relocating sediment near the Walsoorden sandbar, the sediment is stable. Due to larger currents in the relocation area, a higher percentage of the material was transported towards the Walsoorden sandbar. This morphological evolution was seen as positive within the objectives of the relocation strategy. From ecological viewpoint no significant negative changes in trends have been identified.
Further analysis is needed on the applicability of this measure to several other locations in the Western Scheldt (Westerschelde). Commonly known knowledge gaps are on the understanding of sediment transport pathways and resulting sedimentation and erosion patterns and on the inhabitation of benthic macrofauna of new shallow areas.
The second relocation test (2006) proved that also the traditional clapping technique is successful. This technique has the advantage to execute the relocation much quicker compared to the diffuser technique used for the first relocation test in 2004. In this way the relocation along sandbars can be integrated in the continuous maintenance dredging works. The disadvantage of the clapping technique is however that a minimum depth is needed depending on the draft of the used hopper. The technique with the diffuser can, in contrast, be used at shallow water and is much more precise to relocate material at certain spots.

Both relocation tests were successful (all criteria were met), but both tests involved however only very limited relocation quantities which amount to just part (20%) of the relocation quantities that are necessary for full reconstruction of the sandbar point. Extensive monitoring is therefore still required to further investigate the impact of full-scale relocations on the local morpho- and hydrodynamic conditions (Vos et al. 2009). Initially, this would be to see whether the results remain positive with larger volumes of relocated material and, on the other, to evaluate a number of desired effects that could not have been checked during the relocation tests due to their limited nature. Some examples (WL 2006, Vos et al. 2009):
  • Improved distribution of the tidal flow between the ebb and flood channel;
  • An increase of the velocities in secondary channels adjacent to the Walsoorden sandbar, particularly above the Hansweert sill. This will allow the self-eroding capacity to increase and dredging efforts to be reduced;
  • Enrichment of the shallow water and inter-tidal areas with finer granular fractions as a consequence of a reduction of the flow speeds in these areas.
In addition to the alternative relocation strategy, attention must also focus on morphological dredging and the management of hard boundaries (dikes, hard layers) in the estuary in order to manage the Scheldt estuary in a morphologically balanced manner (i.e. reduce the cause of the erosion) (Vos et al. 2009).
As a result of the success of the relocation tests in 2004 and 2006, it was decided that this new relocation strategy (whereby dredged material is relocated along sandbar edges) would be expanded to multiple locations in the Western Scheldt (Westerschelde) (Vos et al. 2009). This is analysed as a separate measure: sandbar relocations 2010 (‘plaatrandstortingen’).


Back to top

Important to know

Reports / Measures / Tools

Report: Management measures analysis and comparison